<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Demolition</title>
    <description>Demolition</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Safe Build Forum</generator>
    <link>http://forum.safebuild.co.za/index.php?forums/demolition.38/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://forum.safebuild.co.za/index.php?forums/demolition.38/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>Demolition of the Profession</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://forum.safebuild.co.za/index.php?threads/demolition-of-the-profession.889/</link>
      <guid>http://forum.safebuild.co.za/index.php?threads/demolition-of-the-profession.889/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Change Agent)</author>
      <dc:creator>Change Agent</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently came across an audit done by a client “agent”, where the builder (PC) were doing a new fit-out in an existing building. This involved add-on structural work to the existing building and a full refit of floors and ceilings, including the electrical installation. So, by definition it qualified as being a construction site.<br />
<br />
What was quite hilarious, was a requirement that a method statement for demolition work was required. Upon enquiry, as I was surprised that demolition work is...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://forum.safebuild.co.za/index.php?threads/demolition-of-the-profession.889/" class="internalLink">Demolition of the Profession</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
